And that tells you everything about her sex life? Look, if you don't like what she did, fine. Don't come here. Don't look. But don't think you have the right to tell others how to live, and don't think that you have the right to pass judgement on others based on what you think of them.
Ok. Klara had sex with lots and lots of people. She even sleeps with total strangers. Is it unlikely that she posted her vagina here for the same reason she spreads her legs for a different guy or girl every night?
Ok. Klara had sex with lots and lots of people. She even sleeps with total strangers. Is it unlikely that she posted her vagina here for the same reason she spreads her legs for a different guy or girl every night?
Look at the facts. Klara spreads her legs for guy after guy after guy. Guy, girl, total stranger, it's all fun for her. She's a nympho and she's offering her vagina for all who want to join in.
And why is your opinion the only valid one? How can you not see that people have different viewpoints than yours and maybe she saw it as something you didn't?
I agree. At least somebody call it what it is. She's a total nympho, and I mean the real kind. She liked showing off what she's got but then she got caught. Now we're supposed to be sorry for her?
If that was the case, why did she remove all her photos because she didn't like the sort of attention she was getting from them, which was precisely the sort of behaviour you mentioned? If she wanted that attention, why did she remove them? You don't know what she was intending with her art, you've just come to your own interpretationa nd decided that yours must be the same as hers. It is not. You are welcome to think whatever you like of it, but that doesn't mean that everyone must share that view.
Actually, I should get upset. It's not educational, it doesn't contribute to anything in anyway whatsoever, and the pictures were posted only so she could gratify herself by reading the comments of appraisal from people looking for gratifying themselves.
IF it was artistic, how come you never see her face from the lips up? If she's confident enough to post her nude self, along with exposing her real name in a conversation with another DA member, why not post her face at least once? Because her face never was shown, it objectified and sexualized that part of her body in the photograph, be it her vagina, breasts or whatever. The only exception to this is porno magazines, in which sluts are sluts, face shown or not shown.
let's not forget that you decide on what that meaning is, and other people make their own decisions. You shouldn't get upset just because they don't treat it the same way you do.
Well, not so much as "morals" as it is simply common sense to me. To me, it is self-evident that something as protected as a sexual organ and with so much meaning behind it should be kept to yourself.
You don't like it, don't look at it. but don't think for a second that you can force other people to live their lives according to what you think is right and wrong. Other people can make the decision for themselves.
Everyone should do what the fuck they want. It's the fucking internet. If she wants to post herself, let her post herself. Some people write poetry, exposing their thinking, and some people post pictures of themselves. Who cares? Only faggot conservative shits.
Klara Wagner made a poor choice! Something as personal as someone's private parts really need to be kept to themselves, not posted on DeviantART, filter or not.
Devious Comments
--
Active ingredient: 2.6% nonsensical ramblings.
DevMeetSyd! [link]
My tutorials can all be found here: [link]
--
Active ingredient: 2.6% nonsensical ramblings.
DevMeetSyd! [link]
My tutorials can all be found here: [link]
--
Active ingredient: 2.6% nonsensical ramblings.
DevMeetSyd! [link]
My tutorials can all be found here: [link]
--
Active ingredient: 2.6% nonsensical ramblings.
DevMeetSyd! [link]
My tutorials can all be found here: [link]
--
Active ingredient: 2.6% nonsensical ramblings.
DevMeetSyd! [link]
My tutorials can all be found here: [link]
--
Active ingredient: 2.6% nonsensical ramblings.
DevMeetSyd! [link]
My tutorials can all be found here: [link]
--
Active ingredient: 2.6% nonsensical ramblings.
DevMeetSyd! [link]
My tutorials can all be found here: [link]
IF it was artistic, how come you never see her face from the lips up? If she's confident enough to post her nude self, along with exposing her real name in a conversation with another DA member, why not post her face at least once? Because her face never was shown, it objectified and sexualized that part of her body in the photograph, be it her vagina, breasts or whatever. The only exception to this is porno magazines, in which sluts are sluts, face shown or not shown.
--
Active ingredient: 2.6% nonsensical ramblings.
DevMeetSyd! [link]
My tutorials can all be found here: [link]
--
Active ingredient: 2.6% nonsensical ramblings.
DevMeetSyd! [link]
My tutorials can all be found here: [link]
--
Active ingredient: 2.6% nonsensical ramblings.
DevMeetSyd! [link]
My tutorials can all be found here: [link]
Previous Page12345... Next Page